The behavior of the Start, Refresh, Enter, Load and Exit events is the same in both generators. A preference for dealing with the trouble (Interface Size) was implemented in VFP. When using certain fonts it is not possible to distinguish the ‘q’ from the ‘g’ in VFP because the height of the edit box control that contains it does not allow it.The buttons’ text appears with another font.It does exist in FPW because the subfile is ‘manually’ drawn. This is because the control used does not have it. VFP’s scrollbar does not have a button for going to the end or to the beginning.This is because of a matter of room and fonts’ height in FPW. The subfile lines’ height (grid) is not respected, so it is a bit higher than at design and in VFP.
Since GeneXus 6 ev 1, the specifier specifies the generators, the exact size and position of all the objects and controls, so their size is equal in FPW and VFP at execution time, excepting the following cases: It does not talk about the differences that happen if we compile programs generated with FPW and compiled with VFP facing the ones compiled with FPW.
Helping the person that converts an application from an environment to another one, by providing information about the differences of behavior between programs generated for FoxPro for Windows and Visual FoxPro.ĭocument the differences between the programs generated for both languages by GeneXus 6 evolution 1 respective generators. Visual FoxPro Tips: Differences between programs generated with FoxPro for Windows and those generated for Visual FoxProĭifferences between programs generated with FoxPro for Windows and those generated for Visual FoxPro Spanish
0 kommentar(er)
